I’ve noticed a somewhat disturbing trend most of my life.
Women about my age and younger proudly declaring they are not feminists. Women
in college and in the workforce who wanted to let you know that when Rush
Limbaugh hollered about feminazis who still gave a damn about equal pay for
equal work they weren’t one of those women. After all, they liked men.
They had boys who were friends and boyfriends. Many later went on to have
husbands, all the while letting the world know that we didn’t *need* feminism
in the US of A, anymore. We have the right to vote and we can be anything we
want to be, right?
Even then my head would spin right round, baby, right round
like a record baby right round. First of all, why is there an assumption that
women who care about equality regardless of one’s genitalia hate men? There is
really absolutely nothing to support that assumption. We may dislike men who
assume they have authority over us simply because they have penises (penii?)
and we have, wait for it, VAGINAS, but that is actually more of a dislike of a
cultural construct and an attitude than an entrenched hatred of, or even battle
with, an entire sex. Also, just to be accurate and show my scholarly roots, it
really is properly feminisms. We are privileged to not have to discuss things
like access to health care (Wait no, that’s not right...), equality in the
workforce (Hmmm… 70something cents on the dollar compared to men doing the
exact. same. jobs?), equal representation in places of power (Ummmm, *some*
counts, right?). Okay, seriously, we really do have it better than women in
many other countries where women have far fewer choices than we do (Hey, at
least we can drive ourselves places!), but we don’t do those women or ourselves
any favors by pretending that inequality is dead in this country.
As a matter of fact, I would posit that the attitude by too
many of my peers that we didn’t need feminism anymore has helped contribute to
the current “war on women.” You don’t think it’s real? What about when a poorly
written piece of legislation ends up requiring that you receive an additional
ultrasound to relive the horror of your missed miscarriage before you get your
D&C to clear everything out so that you don’t get an infection? How about
when you have to supply a doctor’s note to you or your husband’s employer so
that your prescribed medication that is actually part of your insurance plan can be covered by your insurance? Mind you, the insurance plan already has any
pertinent information. This little violation of your privacy would just be so
your employer feels better about what you and your doctor have decided is best
for you. You wouldn’t have to do it for heart or cholesterol medicine.
That would be against the law, but it’s okay to violate HIPAA if it involves
your lady parts. We can’t name them too many times. The wives of Republican
lawmakers in MI might read the word vagina and that would be awful. Many in my
generation, and those that have come after, quit fighting for things to get
better because they were afraid of being accused of unsavory things, content
with their lot, or both, and in the process of declaring feminism dead and
unnecessary, they put it on life-support and have made it more necessary than
ever.
We have the worst maternity leave in the industrialized
world. We have the worst protections for working moms. We have a pregnant woman
named CEO of a major company (Yahoo!- both my exclamation upon hearing the news
and the name of the company) who feels the need to announce that she isn’t even
taking the substandard maternity leave that is mandated (Boo!). She’ll only
take a few weeks, and she’ll work right through it. Some would argue that CEOs
don’t get the same life-work balance as the rest of us, and I would say that
that is actually a HUGE problem because a CEO who doesn’t have it usually sets
the tone for the company. Life-work balance is absolutely necessary, and it is
another area where the US sorely lags behind many other countries, but that is another
blog post. Now, she absolutely has the right to work as much or as little as
she sees fit. She has resources at her disposal that many other WOHM don’t.
That little fact won’t matter to people who want to chase women out of the
workforce by keeping our horrible maternity and family leave policies in place.
They will point to this example and say, “See, you don’t need six weeks leave
or accommodation for your severe sciatica! She didn’t need anything. If you can’t
handle it, here’s the door or your glass ceiling. Have fun, dear.”
Some will also say, “This wouldn’t be a big deal if it were
a man with a baby on the way.” That, unfortunately, is true. It is a big deal
that she was pregnant, disclosed it, and was offered the job anyway because,
despite the fact that it is 100% illegal, people discriminate against pregnant
women when it comes to job offers and promotions on a daily basis. Expectant
fathers don’t face the same bias, or frankly, the same pressure to be the
parent who is there (again, this is a post for another day). I also happen to
think it’s awful that new dads are rarely given, or expected to take, leave. It
is required by law that they be allowed up to 12 weeks, unpaid, which is
exactly what every company is legally required to offer women. Most women who
take “paid” maternity leave have saved up their paid time off (vacation, sick
days, personal days, etc.) to do it, and if they stay out the whole twelve
weeks are likely taking at least some unpaid time off.
The big problem is that it pits women against each other.
Again. It has also brought up the whole SAHM vs. WOHM thing. Again. There are
mothers out there with high-powered careers, and they would be being dishonest
if they didn’t say that that meant sacrificing time with their children, just
as the fathers with high-powered careers do. I would be being dishonest of I
didn’t say that my decision to SAH has affected my lifetime earning potential,
my ability, and even my desire to have a high-powered career. What American
feminism has bought us is the ability to make these choices, and the ability to
choose to not have a family at all if that isn’t right for us. What we seem to
be missing is that not only are women in important positions still enough of an
anomaly that it makes headlines for days, but that when they make it we have to
debate all of their choices. Are they mothers (Whether or not one is a parent will always be mentioned for a woman, but not for a man)? If not, are they
still of child-bearing age? If they are no longer able to have children and don’t
have any, they will have far fewer distractions after all (again with the fact
that the distraction of having children is not figured into the decision to
hire an equally qualified man). If they
are mothers, let’s question their abilities both as mothers and as employees.
We don’t debate the choices of the men who climb the corporate ladder. We don’t
make men feel unwelcome and scrutinized just because they are men. We do it to
women, though, and we call that a huge step in the right direction because they
are even in the positions to begin with. This, my friends, is not the sign of a
country that no longer needs feminism.
Also, it almost always comes down to appearances. People
will mention how attractive (or not) the powerful woman is. It is rare to hear,
“Steve Smith, the new CEO of ACME Sprockets is a bronzed, Greek god,” yet I do
know the new CEO of Yahoo! is not only pregnant, but a “blonde beauty.” I can
rest easier knowing that they didn’t hire some hag.
While we have many choices in this country thanks to those
bra-burning, marching women (and those who came before them) whom so many of
my sisters are afraid of resembling, we are backsliding. We need to make sure
we have real choices. I choose to be a SAHM. Someone else chooses to have a
career, with or without children. We are all respected for our choices, rather
than criticized (within reason; if you kick puppies for a living, I will
criticize you). Equal pay for equal work is a reality. We have access to healthcare unfettered by politics. Our bodies
are not hyper-sexualized and air-brushed to the point that no one can meet
those expectations. Rape is seen as a serious crime and not a messy “he-said/she-said”
or “Well, you *were* wearing *that*!” These things, amongst many other feminist ideas, are my dream. We need to be vigilant.
We need to take back our rights that our foremothers won and that are slipping away
before our eyes, and fight for the rest, ladies. I *am* a feminist, and I am
damn proud of it, and I think you should be too.
