It seems that one theme that runs through a lot of my posts
is treating others with a basic level of courtesy and respect. This post will
be no different. Today, I am going to tackle another aspect of the “Mommy Wars”
(*gag*). The stay-at-home-mom vs the work-outside-the-home mom battle is one
that has been raging for quite some time and shows no signs of slowing, which
is aggravating as Hell because here we are fighting amongst ourselves over who
works “harder” while the politicians are busily chipping away at our rights to
vote, be treated equally in the workplace, and make the best choices for our
reproductive health, amongst other things. Don’t fool yourself; whether you are
pro-choice or anti-abortion much of the current legislation will do little to
stop abortions and much to curb you and your Dr.’s authority to make the
decisions that are the best for you.
Let’s get one thing straight. It is a privilege to be able
to talk about this topic at all. It’s very First World. I can promise that none
of us work as hard as those who live below the subsistence level. Also, back in
the First World, this debate completely discounts single parents (who are
amazing), child-free people, and what and how men should be contributing. The whole
of this topic is too big to cover in one post, so I will likely return to it at
some point.
As the title of my blog implies, I am a SAHM, and have
defined myself as one since my oldest was born. I have actually only been a full-time SAHM
since my youngest was born. Previously, I had a seasonal job that I was able to
work around my husband’s schedule. After the birth of my oldest, I worked close
to full-time hours that first summer, but as my husband is the main wage earner
as his job demands changed, my availability changed because I did not make
enough to justify paying a sitter, gassing up the car, and commuting. It is a
position in which many people have found themselves. While the experience of
one person is not definitive, I will say that that first summer wasn’t easier
or harder than being home, but it was different.
Many things have inspired this post lately. The weird
dichotomy of Mitt Romney being upset when Hilary Rosen, a Democratic
strategist, said that Ann Romney had never worked a day in her life contrasted
with the Mitt Romney who was the governor of MA and offering/forcing on women
w/ very young children the “dignity of work” while forcing them into dead-end
jobs. Which is it Mitt? Either what Hilary Rosen said is true, or that “dignity
of work” thing was a load of BS in an attempt to put a pretty bow on a policy
that was forcing a lot of single mothers into an untenable position. Also,
while I suspect what Ms. Rosen was trying to say was that Mrs. Romney, with her
staff, money, etc. didn’t understand those of us who don’t have those benefits
(and it is what Ms. Rosen claims she meant), many people took it as a knock on the
SAHM. Hilary Rosen even apologized for the comment, later. Still, it was not a
politically bright thing for someone who is a political strategist to say.
.
Then there is the tired, old “This is What a SAHM is Worth”
articles that tend to come out around tax time and Mother’s Day. I hate them.
First of all, I am not a psychologist, a nurse, or a chef. Yes, I deal with emotional
conflict, first-aid, and I cook. I am not actually trained in any of that
(although I do have an expired first-aid certification and I was a psychology
minor, so I’m totally qualified), and for the heavy stuff, I would still go to
the professionals, the people who went to school and trained for years to earn
those titles. I don’t need some outside organization to crunch some numbers and
validate my choices. What I do has value. Yes, part of it is monetary, but much
of that value is intangible. Those articles also raise the hackles of many
women who work outside the home. “Well, *I* do all that AND work. Should I get
two salaries?” Actually, they don’t do all of it, and they don’t do as much of
it. Yes, they care for their children, but someone else does that while they
are at work (This is NOT a judgment; it is a statement of fact; much like the
fact that while being a SAHM is work, it isn’t a job in the sense that you have
a boss, office politics, and a salary, is true), someone they likely pay,
unless it is a family member who is gracious enough to do it for free. Since
they aren’t home all day, there is less daily care of the house, less cleaning
up the family room after the whirlwind, fewer diaper changes, etc. They also
sometimes have to call on those of us who don’t work outside the home for help,
“Can you please get Billy to soccer practice for me? I have a late meeting.”
That being said, of course they raise their own children,
take care of their own homes, and juggle a lot of the other things. The charges
to the contrary are ridiculous. Working outside the home and then coming home
and being “on” for the family can be hard. Of course, there are also the days
with late meetings and travel. There are days when a WOHM might not get to see
her children at all, and not because she’s having a fun night out, either, but
because she is out there busting her hump. Not that there is anything wrong w/
time away for fun; we all need that, sometimes.
I once read an abstract
of a study that found that WOHM work harder than SAHM, but when I searched for
more information and dug into the study, I discovered that the results were
based on self-reporting and journal-keeping. When interviewed and asked
specifically about tasks around the home, it turned out that the WOHM were much
more likely to report every single activity they did in and out of the home,
and the SAHM just sort of hit the highlights. If the SAHM actually logged the
housework, childcare, and errand-running, amongst other things, as assiduously as
the WOHM, it was probably a wash. In other words, while it is tempting to draw
a conclusion about who works harder (and those who ran the study did, despite
the evidence of the interviews; that is bias at work right there, folks), one
really cannot be drawn here, although I would love to see a follow-up study on
how women value what they do and their time and whether working a job affects
the value we place on ourselves. I will tell you there are plenty of people who
work harder than I do, and plenty who don’t work nearly as hard as I do. It has
little to do with who has a paying job and who doesn’t, though. I honestly hate
that this study was even run. It just propagates everything awful about the
SAHM vs WOHM debate out there, and leads to things like this:
Now, it is tempting I suppose, if one has a “little gig on
the side” to see this, high-five other women in the same boat, and let us
bon-bon eating people who *only* raise kids and run a house know how it really
is. They obviously work harder and are superior to us. Of course, those of us
who actually stay at home and prefer Peanut M&M’s to bon-bons
thankyouverymuch, may take issue with this little “joke” that isn’t actually a
joke. Then we are sensitive and can’t take a joke because we see that there is
a little bit of basic respect lacking here, and a lot of not understanding what
it is we do all day. Did you know that SAHM are much more likely to be
depressed than the rest of the population? Did you know that one of the reasons
is that we are continually told that we have no or less value than people with
jobs in many ways (unless we’re getting head pats in “mom salary” articles, or
worse, from Focus on the Family), including things like this little “joke?” Also,
it is full-time, not full time.
“Hey, you get a break from your kids and house for at least
eight hours, five days a week, and you get paid for it! It must be nice to only
parent and run your house part-time while you eat lunch w/ out worrying about
sweeping and cleaning after! Here’s your bon-bon!” is terrible, un-true,
hurtful, and not funny. If I saw that,
or something similar, I would seriously be appalled.
If all the things the “other side” says about you are
un-true and hurtful, why oh why would you assume that the things said about
them are any more truthful and any less hurtful? Is it so hard to understand
that we’ve all made the decisions that we felt were best for our family, and
that we all work hard for our families? I respect any woman who is trying her
best for her family. I don’t assume I do everything she does and vice versa,
even if we are both SAHM. I think it is high time SAHM were offered the same
courtesy as a whole. WOHM don’t do everything I do, and that is okay; I certainly
don’t do everything they do.
I sometimes think that in fighting to be allowed to do other
work and to be respected as just as, if not more capable than men, in every
field, we have helped devalue what is seen as “women’s work” (*shudder*).
Instead of equality, where people choose what is best for them, and all work is
respected, we have come to a place of women disdaining other women who make the
choice to be home, and in return, the women who are at home are lashing out at
the women who have jobs. It sets everyone back when all work isn’t respected. I
also include blue-collar and service work here. Those jobs used to be seen as
important work, but now too many see it as beneath them. I won’t get into how
women’s rights and worker’s rights are intertwined. That topic is a different
post entirely, but just remember that ALL work has value, and we couldn’t get
by without each other.
Thank you for posting this. I am on a very small personal crusade myself for courtesy and civility in communication in an increasingly polarized world, and I could not agree more with you that the SAHM-WOHM "debate" is stale and pointless. Perhaps if fewer of us looked to the larger society to validate our choices, and more of us had the kind of valued support networks of friends and families to talk about our needs and desires that I'm blessed with in friends like you, women could stop feeling defensive and argumentative about our work in our families and our work in the larger community. I see the "mommy wars" as the reason the U.S. still doesn't have paid maternity leave, for example. Women are too busy fighting each other to fight for what all women would benefit from, and a small minority of women are so outraged at the concept of maternity leave when they don't get equivalent personal time off that they further derail the good of the larger society...but that's probably a blog post of my own.
ReplyDeleteI remember being really young and misguided in this respect. Fortunately, I was nowhere near participating in any kind of adult debate then. But I used to really think that staying home or otherwise not having a career was insulting to the memory of famous feminists who fought to let us work. (I also adamantly didn't want kids then, and while I'm not as firm on that as I used to be, I am if anything far more scared of the idea now than I was, because I have so far to go in the daunting field of simply taking care of myself.) I was about sixteen when I realized that was completely stupid; they fought to give us a CHOICE. The life and career of Phyllis Schafly may be an insult to their memory, but a modern stay-at-home mom making her choice to do what is best for her and her family honors them just as much a working mom or, for that matter, a stay-at-home dad or a working dad.
ReplyDeleteI honestly don't remember what prompted me to get my head out of...where it was at the time (I've recently been reminded that some people do not appreciate profanity in comments to their sites, but you know what I mean). Maybe there was a direct stimulus, or maybe it was just growing as a person some. However, while I'm in no way proud of how I used to act, I was a teenager. A few years after that, when I was in college, I saw the author of a book called Get to Work on The Colbert Report. The book was all about how women need to get jobs, and the author (Linda R. Hirshman, whose name I just looked up), basically said women need to "get to work" whether it's what they want or not. You know you sound crazy when character!Stephen makes more sense than you do. I saw my teenage self in her, and I was appalled.
I do not have Internet at my apartment, so I will admit to picking and choosing which news stories I read. I've been missing out on the "Mommy Wars," simply because my gut tells me that anything so titled can only lead to nausea. I recently read someone's opinion that at this point, the conflict isn't between women and men, but between conventional women and unconventional women. Why can't we live and let live? Neither Schlafly nor Hirshman is doing us any good.